Archive for the ‘language’ Category

Hallelujahs and ululations

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Ours is a congregation of many languages. We are slowly learning how to communicate and to be one body together.

Two of the most important lessons I believe we will learn together are the value of songs in the heart language, and the value of music as a form of expression that transcends language.

This morning we enjoyed musical offerings in Nepali and Swahili. Toward the end of the Nepali song, one of our Bhutanese sisters was standing with hands upraised, shouting hallelujah, while a Burundian sister joined in with ululations.

I believe that both expressions were firsts from our Bhutanese and Burundian sisters on a Sunday morning at Living Water.

An alternative English

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

“Voluntary poverty is not meant to be painless.”

This observation was recounted on Facebook recently by a friend of mine who lives very simply as a member of an intentional community. He reflected:

Disempowerment is part of the Christian call. Do we feel it? If we don’t at least sometimes, I wonder how authentically we’re living what we preach?

Here was a surprising response:

It is as if you are speaking an alternative English. I thought that God did not add pain (sorrow) to his blessings. If one deliberately chooses a painful life is he following God’s will?

This response caught my eye because in evangelical churches I often felt like I was speaking an alternative English with regard to our life as Christ-followers. I would speak in terms that made scriptural sense to me, and it seemed that there was no resonance, as though I were speaking into a void. But how could this be if we are all reading the same scriptures?

I recently encountered a phrase that I think explains much of this problem: “rhetorical realm.” It is possible to live next door to someone yet reside in an entirely different rhetorical realm: all of the verbal input that comes to me via preachers, radio, television, the Internet, books, and friends may have no commonality whatsoever with what comes to my Christian neighbor.

But we share scripture in common. Shouldn’t that be one place where our rhetorical realms overlap?

In certain particulars, yes. But by and large our rhetorical realms are a strong magnet that draws in the words of scripture and envelops them, making their meaning to us unintelligible to our neighbors who reside in another rhetorical realm.

Take this Beatitude: “Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.”

As a child of a prosperous family in the prosperous United States, I had always understood that to mean that our mourning would be relieved by God’s comfort. God’s comfort would come and we would no longer mourn.

One evening shortly after the start of the Iraq war, I was sitting in the car waiting for my tears to stop so I could go into a cafe and get some work done. I wondered how I would bear my grief that my country was visiting such destruction on children, women, and men across the ocean. Would the grief ever leave me?

Then the words came to me: “Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted,” and I realized that I’d always misunderstood this Beatitude.

It’s not that God’s comfort will dismiss our mourning. No, as the circumstances that we mourn continue, so does our mourning, and into this mourning, God’s comfort comes. The mourning continues, and it is blessed.

I could not have perceived this meaning if I had continued to reside in the Christian triumphalist, American exceptionalist rhetorical realm that tempts so many of us, then traps us with its insistence that it is the only realm where historical and Christian truth prevails.

Today a man named James who has been worshiping with our Mennonite congregation for a few months said that he has noticed that almost every week there is talk about loving our enemies. He said that embrace of this truth makes ours a very unusual congregation and one he is very glad to have found.

Loving enemies. Esteeming others more highly than ourselves. Giving our surplus to those who have need. Forgiving many times. Practicing hospitality. Rejoicing with those who rejoice and mourning with those who mourn. These are the words, the ideas, the rhetoric that define our congregational realm. Sometimes it’s painful here. We don’t always triumph. But our mourning is blessed, and God’s comfort is near.

Language and preaching

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

On Sunday my brother and I visited Cincinnati Mennonite Fellowship, where Pastor Joel Miller delivered three mini-sermons on Ephesians 5:21—6:9, the challenging passage about submission. It so happened that his wife was scheduled to read the scripture passage to the congregation that morning; after reading it, she said wryly, “Let’s see what Joel does with this.”

I was impressed by what he did with it,* but my brother, who has a cognitive disability, was confused. He has a tough time with metaphors, and the part about the blind men and the elephant really threw him for a loop.

Still, he enjoyed the service and seemed to think well of the church. The people were very friendly. They laughed easily together. The printed bulletin detailed a surprising amount of activity for such a small congregation. Good reasons to return even if the sermons are hard for him to understand.

The experience got me to thinking about the people in my own congregation who are just beginning to learn English. They come Sunday after Sunday though they have difficulty understanding the sermons. There is so much more than the sermon that draws them there and keeps them there.

Doctrine is important; clear preaching is important. But they are not alone the measure of a church, and they cannot alone preach God’s word. Maybe one way to evaluate whether a congregation is fully communicating the gospel is to consider how the good news is heard and experienced by congregants who don’t understand all the words.

*Joel delivered three separate mini-sermons from three different interpretive perspectives, speaking each time as someone who holds that perspective. So as not to promote one perspective over the other, he had a member of the congregation pick the names of the mini-sermons out of a hat to determine the order in which he presented them. Surely the congregation knew where he stood, and it’s not likely that everyone agreed with him, but he created an atmosphere of respect that would allow for unity nonetheless.

  • Tags

  • Archives

    • September 2010
      M T W T F S S
      « Aug    
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      27282930